Tuesday
Jan242006
The context of things - A Theory
Tuesday, January 24, 2006 at 11:51PM
Ok so here is a thing that we were talking about last night and rob figured I should post on it so here we go. It kind of goes back to how context affects things. Â
Basic premise - context affects the way that we view things (this is true as it is what my thesis is on, well it is not on this particular context thing - it is about dual meaning words in sentences - but I digress).Â
Context can be why we find things, funny, sad etc but there are some universally funny things - such as mittens. Now mittens in and of themselves are not funny to me but they are to Rob (I don’t know why he cant explain) but I think that they only become funny when there is a person wearing them (again I don’t know why - they just are). So here we see context playing a role. Ok so consider what mittens are - they are little bags for your hands. So this being the case why are socks not funny? Â
 See if you look at socks as an item - not funny (unless they have a funny cartoon or joke on them) but as an object - not likely to make you chuckle. If you look at socks in context (on feet) then - nope still not funny - which goes against the mitten theory.
 I then pointed out a somewhat valid point - socks - not funny - toe socks - funny as all hell. What you may ask are toe socks - they are like little gloves for your hands. So toe socks as an object - quite funny, in context (on feet) friggin’ hilarious. Â
Ok so what about gloves - nope not funny as objects or in context - much like socks. So it is just when we have an object that is not used in a way you expect it becomes funny (or at least ridiculed)
 Ergo I propose - foot gloves and hand socks - very funny things. I think I will call this the foot glove, hand sock theorem.Â
 See look how my university education was not wasted .... I wonder if I can get a grant for further investigation!Â
Â
Basic premise - context affects the way that we view things (this is true as it is what my thesis is on, well it is not on this particular context thing - it is about dual meaning words in sentences - but I digress).Â
Context can be why we find things, funny, sad etc but there are some universally funny things - such as mittens. Now mittens in and of themselves are not funny to me but they are to Rob (I don’t know why he cant explain) but I think that they only become funny when there is a person wearing them (again I don’t know why - they just are). So here we see context playing a role. Ok so consider what mittens are - they are little bags for your hands. So this being the case why are socks not funny? Â
 See if you look at socks as an item - not funny (unless they have a funny cartoon or joke on them) but as an object - not likely to make you chuckle. If you look at socks in context (on feet) then - nope still not funny - which goes against the mitten theory.
 I then pointed out a somewhat valid point - socks - not funny - toe socks - funny as all hell. What you may ask are toe socks - they are like little gloves for your hands. So toe socks as an object - quite funny, in context (on feet) friggin’ hilarious. Â
Ok so what about gloves - nope not funny as objects or in context - much like socks. So it is just when we have an object that is not used in a way you expect it becomes funny (or at least ridiculed)
 Ergo I propose - foot gloves and hand socks - very funny things. I think I will call this the foot glove, hand sock theorem.Â
 See look how my university education was not wasted .... I wonder if I can get a grant for further investigation!Â
Â
in General
Reader Comments